19 November 2010

Literary Blog Hop: Literary Nonfiction

Literary Blog HopThe Literary Blog Hop, hosted by The Blue Bookcase, poses another fascinating question this week: Is there such a thing as literary non-fiction? If so, how do you define it? Examples?

Defining "literature" is hard enough, and now we are throwing "nonfiction" into it. And yet, my answer is a most definite yes. For me, what is literary has very little to do with the veracity of the story.
Narrative nonfiction is the easiest to classify as literary because much of it subscribes to the same aesthetic and stylistic conventions as fiction, the more common owner of the term literary. For me, the only real distinction between narrative nonfiction and narrative fiction is the veracity of the story: one story really happened and one did not. In both, there are protagonists, antagonists, central conflicts, inciting incidents, resolutions, themes, etc. Writers of both are concerned with drawing readers into the story, developing complex and interesting characters, and revealing a truth to the reader. For example, Diane Ackerman's The Zookeeper's Wife tells the story of a Warsaw zookeeper and his wife who saved around 300 people during World War II by hiding them in the bomb-ravaged zoo, both in the house and in the animal cages. The story has a specific plot line, interesting characters, and a complex message, much as a work of fiction would.

The problem with narrative nonfiction is not, in my mind, whether or not it is literary. The problem is whether or not it is nonfiction. If nonfiction is narrowly defined as the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, then most narrative nonfiction doesn't fit. Authors take a wee bit (or a gigantic chunk) of artistic license when writing narrative nonfiction. We can read historical figures' diaries, research the setting they lived in, read other accounts of their lives, we can do everything to learn about past figures. But once we start writing about who they were and what they did - or worse how they felt and what they thought - we are straying into the realm of fiction. Now personally, I have absolutely no problem with this. I actually love books which combine real life events/people with fictional elements. Literary nonfiction.

Other types of nonfiction can feel quite literary without crossing the line into fiction. Personal or creative essays can be very literary. Charles Bowden's The Bone Garden of Desire (Read it online here) is the essay that got me interested in this style of writing. Bowden weaves food, flowers, lust, and death in this poetic personal essay. The essay is fragmentary, moving horizontally forward and backward through time even as it moves vertically through the topics. I'm not sure why I assign those particular directions, but I do. Something in the tone, the interrelation of these primal topics, and the melancholy seduces me. Any piece of writing that can be described in such a way is literary in my opinion.  Essays like Bowden's focus on form - the style of writing - as a way to deliver content. Authors manipulate the form to mirror or contradict the content in an effort to challenge readers, and this relationship between form and content is how I define literary.


Non-literary non-fiction elevates content over form, concerning itself with delivering specific information in a relatively straightforward manner. Angela Provitera's Teaching Today's College Student is not concerned with drawing you into a story or with artful sentence construction; she is merely, and appropriately, trying to analyze the current mentality of college students so that professors can modify teaching habits to suit the new model of student. Neil Postman's amazing analysis of the effect media is having on the populace, Amusing Ourselves to Death, is a wonderfully complex and important work; but again, the book's primary concern is analysis, and of course, persuasion. And finally, Ben Thompson's Badass, one of my favorite reads of the year, contains multiple short essays, quickly and hilariously summarizing the life of a historical badass. Clever? Absolutely. A good read? Definitely. Literary? No.

Hopefully some of what I've said in here has made sense. I'm writing this rather early in the morning, not my best time, and I didn't even get coffee this morning as we are out of creamer. Grocery shopping must occur today. Yuck.

17 comments:

  1. You've made some fabulous points here, and I do feel the same -- sometimes if it's literary, it might not all be true...

    I do abhor grocery shopping. Have fun...

    Here's my Literary view...: Coffee and a Book Chick -- Literary Blog Hop...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am adding both to my tbr pile...

    Here is my Literary Blog Hop post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with a lot of your points, and have to say that I am pretty excited about reading The Zookeeper's Wife. I have heard such great things about it!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I totally agree with you! But it can be confusing determining truth from exaggeration from just plain falsification. I guess I've never sat down and considered non-fiction that I would call literary, but they definitely exist. (BTW, sorry for my absence. I am finally back!)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh we do agree, don't we? And essays are a very interesting case in point, notably because they sidestep some of the problems with veracity that dog other non-fiction works. The essay clearly passes through a subjective perspective, and that's really where its whole interest lies. Now I feel a craving for a really good essay collection coming on - I'll look up the one you mention!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Diane Ackerman is a marvelous example! I also think Woolf's A Room of One's Own is a great piece of literary non-fiction, and I've even read some biographies that have that ... flair? ... of language that makes it more than just straight-up non-fiction. Diana Souhami's biography on Natalie Barney and Liane de Pougy was interspersed with poems and creative ephemera about her own romantic relationships.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I didn't realize The Zookeeper's Wife was nonfiction. I think my library has it shelved in the fiction section...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think a fine example of line crossing is Haruki Murakami's "What I talk about, when I talk about running" ostensibly a book about Running & an autobiography yet is it, as it covers so much more in such a small book.
    enjoyed your post.
    Thanks.
    Parrish

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just when I figure out one literary genre, you throw another one there to mess with me. I've never really thought about this before, but I'm thinking that I have read some.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "The problem with narrative nonfiction is not, in my mind, whether or not it is literary. The problem is whether or not it is nonfiction."

    Excellent point! I have The Zookeeper's Wife in my tbr pile. Tried to get my book club to read it, but it wasn't selected. I still want to read it though.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think the question of truth in literary nonfiction is a good, and complicated, one. Personally, I don't mind if authors take a little artistic licenses with people (historical figures, mostly) that they can't actually talk with, but I always like to know how they made some of their assumptions.

    Now, if it's a writer writing about contemporary people, I'm a little less willing to allow artistic license -- if it's possible to talk with the people one is writing about, I think it's really important to be as accurate as possible. But again, I love to know how nonfiction writers gathered their information.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Good food for thought, especially for me because this is not something I have thought about. Not even sure I am qualified to answer such a question, since I was not an English major. The question of non-fiction however, can be a difficult to ascertain since some stories although non-fiction, there is, as you said some artistic license. I guess it depends on a number of factors, such as the subject material, and however much is "artistic". I need to look for literature podcats in my future :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes, very nicely written.

    Here's my post on literary nonfiction. I'd love to hear what you think.

    And if you have read any wonderful literary books
    published in 2010, I urge you to nominate your favorites
    for The Independent Literary Awards. The awards
    include categories of Literary Fiction and Literary Non-Fiction.
    Nominations close December 15.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Authors manipulate the form to mirror or contradict the content in an effort to challenge readers, and this relationship between form and content is how I define literary."
    I completely agree with you here. Some people argue that literary works ultimately hold form over content, but I think the best literary writers manipulate the relationship between form and content to reveal greater truths.
    Great post, thanks for participating Trisha!

    ReplyDelete
  15. The Zookeeper's Wife might have to be my next foray into non-fiction, literary or not. It sounds like a fascinating story, and I am always humbled to read the accounts of people who put themselves on the line to help other people during the Holocaust.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Great post! I had never really thought about "Literary Nonfiction" before, but you brought up some great examples and also described it really well. The Zookeeper's Wife looks like a very interesting book, I will have to add that to my to-read list! Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Talk to me baby!