Showing posts with label weekly geeks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label weekly geeks. Show all posts

25 January 2011

Weekly Geeks: Bring on the Ladies

This week's Weekly Geeks has four very intriguing questions:
  • What are your feelings about literary prizes regarding WHO gets selected? Do you think literary judges tend to be biased more toward men? If yes, why do you think that is?
  • Tell us about some of your favorite books written by women.
  • Do you tend to read more books authored by men or by women?
  • What are your thoughts about the label "chick lit?" Do you think it makes a difference what we call women's fiction? Are books written by women more likely to be labeled "light," or unimportant? 

I am clearly supposed to focus on one of the questions, but in the interests of overachieving....

Literary Prizes and Male Bias
I do not have enough background knowledge to answer this with any sort of authority; however, my gut reaction is that statistics are on the side of men winning because I think there are more male literary (in the definitions employed by awards) authors than female. I don't necessarily think that the results are due to bias, just odds. And I do have a problem when people freak out about women not winning, claiming sexism when it may be skill. I do not think, at all, that gender should come into play when deciding on the literary merit of a book (you know, since books don't have any reproductive parts). I do not think men should be excluded or awards should be "more inclusive" unless the work merits the attention. If a book written by a middle-aged male is "better" than the book written by a female, then the male's book wins. Now the definition of "better" does cause some serious issues, but that's for another discussion. And I realize that this opinion may not be a very popular one, but to be clear: if the book written by the female is "better" than the one by the male, then it should win (obviously). It would be perfect if the judges had no freaking clue who wrote the book they are judging (impossible, but hey, I can dream can't I?).

Male v. Female Authors
I, quite fortuitously, am at about 50% each for my male v. female author ratio, which I think is awesome. I like the idea that I read about equally. Last year, I read 58 books by males and 69 books by females (and quite a few authors who may freak out by the binary listed here : D )

Chick Lit
To me, this term describes a particular style of book, and it makes no difference whether a male or a female wrote it. For example, Nicholas Sparks is chick lit to me. I even think the term "women's fiction" is distinct from chick lit. And I don't think the gender of the author is any indication of the "heaviness" of the text.

Books by Women That I've Loved
This list could go on for an obscene quantity of time, so I'll try to keep it short:

"Literary" Favorites from the Last Few Years:

Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier
The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood
Cranford by Elizabeth Gaskell
Fingersmith by Sarah Waters
The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows
The Lunatic, the Lover, and the Poet by Myrlin A. Hermes

Great Female Authors that Pop to Mind (not necessarily "literary"):

Virginia Woolf, Suzanne Collins (Underland Chronicles), Margaret Atwood, Daphne du Maurier, Isabel Allende, J.K. Rowling, Dorothy Allison, Zora Neale Hurston, Shirley Jackson, Toni Morrison, Ayn Rand, Alice Walker, and Edith Wharton

Overall, I think women have contributed tremendously to the wonder that is reading, and I just wish that gender could take a backseat to the books (what's really important). It's sad that we still live in a time where the gender of an author has such an impact on the perception and criticism of a book. Maybe one day we can break free from this strange gender binary, so wrapped up in difference, and focus on a more inclusionary gender where we realize that the continuum that is gender does not create or negate skill in writing.

19 January 2011

Weekly Geeks: You Know You're Looking at a Winner

I haven't participated in Weekly Geeks for some time, but this one really got my attention. "This past Monday, the American Library Association announced their awards. Some you've probably heard of: Newbery, Caldecott, Printz, etc. Some you might not be as familiar with: Geisel, Sibert, Batchelder, Odyssey, Schneider, etc." I am not an awards person. I love books and movies and don't give two cents about Newberrys or Oscars. What can I say?

I was intrigued to see who won this time around though since I actually read some contemporary fiction this past year. Here are a few of the winners and my connection to them:

Ship Breaker by Paolo Bacigalupi won the Printz Award, given to books displaying "excellence in literature for young adults". I have this one sitting on the TBR shelves.


Room by Emma Donaghue is one of the ten books receiving the Alex Awards, given out to the ten adult books which are most appealing to teenagers. I read and reviewed this one back in December, and I can definitely see why it is on an award list.

Terry Pratchett won the Margaret A. Edwards' award which honors for making a lasting contribution to YAL. I read - and obsessively love - Good Omens which he co-authored with Neil Gaiman, and I have a few Discworld books sitting on the TBR shelves.

And that's it peeps. Those are the only three winners I have in the house. I have read will grayson, will grayson by David Levithan and John Green and The Knife of Never Letting Go by Patrick Ness, both of which received honorary mentions, and I have to say that I am a bit surprised neither one actually won an award. Both were excellent novels. Jennifer Donnelly's Revolution, which I have somewhere, also received an honorable mention.

Back to my non-interest in awards though. My problem mainly stems from traditional reading habits. Prior to blogging, I primarily read classics; awards, on the other hand, are all about the contemporary. It was a very, very rare occurrence that I read a book before it had been out on the shelves for at least five years (typically more like 50 years). Obviously, this minimized my interest in awards. I definitely read more new(ish) releases this year than in any previous year in my life.

The other part of my problem is that I believe reading is a very personal experience. What I like, others don't. What others like, I don't. And that is just fine. It's nice to see books getting credit for particular literary talent, but the true judge of a book is whether or not the reader likes it; and that is individual, fluid, and personal.

I do wonder though - what awards do you guys really follow? Are there any awards that you have found consistently put forward excellent novels?

08 October 2010

Weekly Geeks: Dewey's Readathon

In just 24 hours, Dewey's 24 Hour Read-a-Thon begins, and I can't begin to tell you how excited I am. Being able to dedicate an entire day to reading - and nothing but reading - makes me feel all tingly inside. Since Weekly Geeks is focused on plans for the readathon this week, and since I am woefully unprepared at this time, I thought a blog post dedicated to getting my act together was a good idea.

Before I get to the what I'm going to read portion, I thought I would focus on a different question posed over at Weekly Geeks: What is your strategy for the readathon?

Fantastic question. I did not have a plan last year: I spent 14 hours 8 minutes reading, and yes I did keep a very specific and correct account. I read 8 books and 1771 pages. Eight hours and 11 minutes were spent blogging where I completed 9 mini-challenges and left 150 comments on others' blogs. I also hosted a mini-challenge and somewhere in there managed to shower and eat a butterscotch sundae.

I'm going in with the same non-plan plan this year. I'll have it a bit easier as my overworked brain couldn't think up a fun mini-challenge, so I'm just reading and cheerleading this time around. My family, students, and friends have been notified I will be MIA this weekend. The hubby will more than likely eat dinner and head out with friends, so I should be good to go for 24 solitary hours of reading. I even nixed the possibility of phone calls for that period of time!

Here are the books I really want to get to during the readathon:

The Financial Lives of Poets by Jess Walter
A cultural satire, FLP stars an out-of-work, going broke bloke who comes up with an unusual and illegal way to make some cash.

The Dark is Rising Trilogy by Susan Cooper
I have heard wonderful things about this series, and I finally own it.  With all three installments, nicely packaged in one book, I'm ready to go.

Vanishing by Deborah Willis
A collection of short stories which has been given big thumbs up by many bloggers, this is one I'm really excited to get to.


The Virago Book of Ghost Stories ed. by Richard Dalby
As the title clearly indicates, this is a collection of ghost stories which I think is a perfect way for me to get in the Halloween spirit!

Here are some books I plan on using as breaks from the more text-heavy reads:

The Sexy Book of Sexy Sex by Kristen Schaal and Rich Blomquist
This is "the ultimate guide to getting your rocks off" and so far I'm loving it. I think it will be a great 'need a break' book since it's told in small snippets of funny.

Sandman Vol. 4:  Seasons of Mist by Neil Gaiman
A graphic novel and the fourth in an awesome series, Seasons of Mist is an obvious break book.

Why We Love and Why We Fight by Simon Van Booy
Full of short, thought-provoking selections on the titled topic, these two books will be fun reads if they are anything like Why Our Decisions Don't Matter...which they will be...seriously, there's no doubt they will be just like that one...


Cirque du Freak nos. 9 through 12 by Darren Shan
These are very fast, easy reads and will be perfect for the later hours of the readathon when my brain starts going fuzzy.

As I have hundreds of books on the TBR shelves, there is really no guarantee that these will be the books I end up reading - I'm too much of a spontaneous reader to limit myself to a list - but these are my thoughts right now.


So anyone else doing the readathon - and planning making it all 24 hours!?!?!?!

24 June 2010

Weekly Geeks: Me and My Books

Weekly Geeks offers bookish blog-writing prompts every Saturday, and while I don't participate consistently, I do love the wonderful questions posed this week:

"So this week, I am curious about those gigantic TBR piles which readers tend to accumulate. Please share with us your habits, tendencies or obsessions when it comes to hoarding behavior.
  • Post a photo (or two or three) of your books to-be-read
  • Share your buying or book accumulating habits - how bad of a problem do YOU have?!?!?
  • Do you keep all the books you've read, or do you give them away or sell them?
  • Can you walk past a bookstore and not go in? If you go in, do you impulsively purchase?

Anyone who has read this blog knows that I am an awful hoarder of books, and that my home collection borders on the obsessive.  In the year since those pictures were taken, the library has changed. For example, a little over 100 books are on the floor in front of the above shelves (from BEA); and about 30 books are piled on the center shelves from my birthday book-acquiring extravaganza. I did manage to get rid of a few books though.  About half of the guilty pleasures were donated to my local library, and right now I have about 100 books set to go into my garage sale next weekend.

As for unread books - the infamous TBR pile - I refuse to keep those books separate from the already-read books, in part because seeing those 535 books in a pile together would just freak me out.  I am determined to make some serious headway in my unread books this year, especially after the major accumulation from BEA and BBC. I should be pretty set on books until at least Christmas.  Actually I should be set for a few years, but I'm hoping I can hold out until I can receive books as presents.

No matter if we are talking about read or unread books, I like to keep them.  I like to play with them, organizing and reorganizing, logging and listing, opening them, smelling them, fanning those beautiful pages...is it getting hot in here or is it just me?

Well, you get the picture. Now if you'll excuse me. I'm going to go take a cold shower...Whew!

08 May 2010

Weekly Geeks: The Author v. The Book

Weekly Geeks wants to know if it is possible to separate a writer's non-writing life from the books the produce. 

Does an author's politics matter to you? Do you have a favourite book or series written by someone you know to be your political opposite? Or have you stopped reading works by a particular author after discovering that their politics was radically different from your own?

What about their personality? Have you ever stopped reading an author's work after seeing or hearing them talk because you didn't like what you saw or heard?

And how about that secret past? How would you feel if you found out your favourite author was a murderer or some other kind of criminal? Are there some crimes that you would be OK about and others that would stop you following their work? Do you know about the pasts of 'your' authors? Do you want to?

I rarely have this issue as I'm woefully ignorant regarding who the authors are in real life.  I just don't seem to care very much about their personal lives; sometimes I don't even know if they are alive or dead!  The world of book blogging has made me more and more aware of authors though, so there have been a few instances of Author Disappointment.

For instance, I ran across this problem when I wrote my review of Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card.  Apparently Card, a Mormon, is anti-homosexual, particularly anti-gay marriage.  He also appears to be something of a chauvinist.  I really enjoyed the following quote which is his reasoning for why homosexual marriage is a travesty:
Husbands need to have the whole society agree that when they marry, their wives are off limits to all other males. He has a right to trust that all his wife's children would be his...Wives need to have the whole society agree that when they marry, their husband is off limits to all other females. All of his protection and earning power will be devoted to her and her children, and will not be divided with other women and their children...  Faithful sexual monogamy, persistence until death, male protection and providence for wife and children, female loyalty to children and husband, and parental discretion in child-rearing [is the foundation of marriage].

What an ass!  So men marry so that other men can't have sex with their woman, and women marry for money...a man protects and a woman is faithful...how unbelievably archaic. And it gets better ladies and gentlemen.  Card likens homosexual desire to the following:
We expect alcoholics to be able to refrain from driving when drunk. We expect pedophiles to keep their hands to themselves. We expect aggressive males to curb their need to fight with perceived rivals. We expect people whose mental illnesses are only contained by drugs to take those drugs... We expect heterosexual males -- males who are expressing the very drive that leads to reproduction of the genes, and which in other primate species is often expressed as rape -- to be able to recognize that "no means no" at every stage of wooing and coition.

In other words, a man desiring another man is the same as a man wanting to rape a woman.  Um, not even close, you homophobic misogynist.  I realize I'm going on a bit here about Card's beliefs, but that's just to get across that I absolutely despise his ideology. 

But I still think Ender's Game is a fantastic book.  I will still recommend it to those who are struggling to get in to reading, as on many occasions, this book was the start of a non-reader's journey into the world of books. 

Stephanie Meyer and her Twilight series give me pause too.  I find the overt 'no sex before marriage' morality overblown and ridiculous.  Not too mention, the 'if I touch you even a little bit, I might get carried away and hurt you' crapola makes me gag in feminist outrage.  Morally, I disagree with Meyer's belief system - clearly Mormons and I don't share a worldview - but I still think there is enough benefit and enjoyment to reading the books that any sort of boycott or overt protestation would be silly.

Just like I believe the censorship of my beliefs a nasty evil, so too do I believe the censorship of beliefs I disagree with.  If I think it's ridiculous that people don't read Harry Potter because it's "Anti-Christian", then it's also ridiculous for me to not read Meyer and Card because they are "Pro-Mormon".

So to sum up what is definitely a convoluted little spiel:  While I may disapprove of an author's beliefs or actions, this does not affect whether or not I read his/her work.  I'm anti-censorship (even of myself) for all belief systems, and sometimes the book doesn't even carry the deplorable belief in its pages.  Reading is not agreeing, and I believe that reading belief systems other than your own is actually a positive intellectual pursuit.  It opens your mind to other ways of thinking and helps you determine your own personal beliefs. It sparks discussion, contemplation, and growth.  And all of that is, in my opinion, a good thing.

I do admit, however, that from time to time I'm disgusted that my money (if I buy the book) is supporting someone with such different beliefs from my own.

So what do you guys think?

15 March 2010

Weekly Geeks: Wait, Books have Authors?

Weekly Geeks features book bloggy questions every Saturday. Head on over and join the fun!

Reactions to Reading created this week's geek:  Having recently been told that I'm odd because I'm not terribly interested in author interviews I've started to ponder whether there are two types of readers...those who stick to the books versus those who like to know more about the author's background, thoughts, motivations and writing process.

So, what about you?
  • Do you seek out interviews with authors of books you've enjoyed? Why or why not?
  • Do you interview authors on your blog? If yes what did you gain from the interview process? If no is it because you don't want to or because you haven't felt able to ask an author yet?
  • Do you subscribe to the blogs of authors you like? Which ones? All the authors you like or only certain ones?
  • Do you track down author websites or look for biographical information about them elsewhere? Would you skip reading a book if you couldn't find out anything about its author?
  • Have you hosted an author on a blog tour? Was it someone whose books you already read or did it introduce you to a new author?

I am 100%, no question about it, completely and totally, a book person.  Authors are merely the vehicles that bring me my drug.  (I apologize to any author reading this post).  How about a 'for example'?

The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy is one of my favorite books.  I've read the entire series (as written by Douglas Adams) four or five times.  But I haven't picked up another Douglas Adams book, I don't really care about the television and radio productions of the story, and I know practically nothing about Adams' life.  It's the story that matters, the characters, the plot, the escapism.  All of that real world hullabaloo means very little to me.

Sometimes I don't even know who the author is when I'm reading.  I know, I know, terrible of me.  Blogging has increased my interest in reading particular authors.  Daphne du Maurier, Margaret Atwood, and Sarah Waters spring to mind as authors I'm interested in reading more of; but still I've only read one by each and have no burning intention to read their entire catalog.

Neil Gaiman is my most present author.  I have 13 of his books on my shelves, and I subscribe to his blog, which by the way is entertaining, well written, and personal.  No one else comes close to him as far as number of books on my shelf. I think the next most-prominent-on-my-shelves author is J.K. Rowling with 7, but considering that's one series of books, I'm not sure that really counts.  I just don't actively pursue reading any one author's complete line up of books.  I have roughly 1500 books on my shelves and about 1000 authors. I do so like variety.


Side Note:  William Shakespeare (23) and Agatha Christie (26) are actually the winners for most books on my shelves, but as I haven't read all of their books - and I've read all of Gaiman and Rowling - I didn't feel that really counted.

Author Interviews:  I don't seek out author interviews, either to feature them on my blog or to read them on someone else's.  If I haven't read the book yet, I definitely will not read an author interview about that book.  I am 100% anti-spoilers for books.  Most of the time I won't even read the entire synopsis on the back cover of.  Just a quick glance, enough to let me know if it's my cup of tea, nothing more.

Author Importance:  People seem concerned with exigence, the motivation for writing, and author's intention, but I've always been more interested in reader interpretation.  No matter what the author intended to write, it is what the reader reads that counts.  I'm not sure I've explained that well, but there you have it.  (And once again, my apologies if there are any authors reading this).

What about all of you?  Any more book people out there?

08 December 2009

Weekly Geeks: A Bookish Journey

A Bookish Journey

How it gets picked…Rather randomly. Most of the time I pick up a book after perusing my shelves for a title that strikes my fancy. Sometimes choice is determined by my challenges, but even then what specific book gets read is dependent upon my mood.

How it gets read…Mainly I just read. I tend to read one book at a time and in large chunks. Rarely do I spend more than two or three days with a book, and most of the time I finish a book in the same day I start reading it. It is very rare that I write while reading; sometimes I dog ear pages with particular passages that I want to revisit, but quite often I read with very little thought to reviewing later.

How it gets reviewed…Very little time passes between finishing a book and writing a review. Most often I close the book and immediately open my blog and start typing. I tend to write reviews in the moment, never writing, putting away, revisiting and revising, before posting. This is probably not the best way to do things but it works for me.  More than this would feel a bit too much like my job (I teach composition, literature, and film).

What happens after…I have quite a process with my books. After reading and reviewing on my blog, the book is entered on my yearly reading list, I catalogue it in an Excel spreadsheet, the review is copied over to LibraryThing, and if relevant the appropriate link is posted on a challenge blog. Then the book is placed in my library according to basic genre – Literary Fiction, SFF, YAL, Romance, Personal Stories, History, Philosophy, and Education. If I don’t wish to keep the book – which is rare – it gets logged onto BookMooch.

In short:
  1. Choose Book
  2. Read book
  3. Review Book on eclectic/eccentric
  4. Log Book on Hominem unius libri timeo
  5. Copy review to Library Things
  6. Add link to challenge blog (if relevant)
  7. Update Challenge Lists on Hominem unius libri timeo (if relevant)
  8. Finalize Challenge Post on eclectic/eccentric and add to finished challenges list on hominem unius libri timeo (if relevant)
  9. Catalog book in Excel Spreadsheet: Alive/Dead Author, Fiction/Nonfiction, Challenge/Non-Challenge, Genre, Link to Review
  10. Place in library or add to BookMooch

20 October 2009

Weekly Geeks: Blogging Extras

Ruth writes:

Book blogging, as a concept, is essentially pretty simple: If you have Internet access and an opinion about a book, you can be a book blogger. However, actually maintaining a book blog is much more complicated — our blogs are labors of love that require a lot of time, energy and devotion. For this edition of Weekly Geeks, I want to focus on the little things that make your blogging and/or reading life a bit easier. Do you use sites like GoodReads, LibraryThing or Shelfari to organize your books? Do you swear by Book Darts? Couldn’t live without your Book Buddy? Love connecting with other bloggers on sites such as Twitter? Tell us about what makes your blog tick. Is there something specific that keeps you organized or inspired?

When it comes to keeping track of books, my newfound love of Excel is making all the difference. In my Reading Spreadsheet (in need of a clever title), I have worksheets for books read, books recommended, to read challenge lists, my banned books challenge, and as of yesterday a sheet for my readathon schedule. Organizing is part of the fun for me!


My other bookish organizer is LibraryThing which I use to keep track of books I own, books I've read, and books I want. Now I've even started copying over my reviews from my blog to LibraryThing. My username is EclecticEccentric over there if you'd like to friend me.

To manage my blog reading, I adore Google Reader. My GR doesn't necessarily adore me right now as it is consistently busy, but I have found it invaluable in keeping me apprised of new posts, allowing me to mark posts to read again later, and I'm sure there is a whole host of other possibilities I haven't begun to explore.

Despite my ridiculous love for collecting books, my husband set me straight on keeping every single book that crosses my path. He's also the one who introduced me to BookMooch. I'm now an avid user which may have backfired on my husband as I seem to get just as many books as I send out. Over at BookMooch, I'm Trillian if you'd like to friend me and share some books.

I resisted Twitter. I really did. Even now, I don't actually talk to or follow anyone that isn't a member of the book blogging community. But I just couldn't resist sneaking in on all the wonderful bookish conversations going on, so I joined. My username is Trish422 if you are interested in following me.

So what are your tools of the trade?

10 October 2009

Weekly Geeks: Recommendations




I wanted to talk this week about book recommendations. Where do you go for book recommendations? How often do you challenge yourself to get out of your comfort zone? How often do you read outside your favorite-and-best genre? How often do you try a new-to-you author? How often do you take a chance? This week, I'd like to offer you a few opportunities.

So your assignment this week, if you choose to play along, is to ask your readers for recommendations. Choose a genre--any genre--and ask for recommendations. You can be as general or as specific as you like. Consider it as an "I'm looking for...."

The second part of the assignment is to write a list of recommendations and share them with your readers. Choose a genre--any genre--and share your list of favorites. I think of this as "If you're looking for...."

I'm hoping that some really great books get recommended this week! Did you add any new books or authors to your wish list? If you'd like you can write a wrap-up post mentioning which books you're thinking about reading based on this week's weekly geek.
What a wonderful assignment! I know I'm missing out on Contemporary Literary Fiction as I have a tendency to read old and really really old books before picking up the recently published. I would love to see a list of contemporary lit fic, stories published in the last fifteen years or so that aren't YAL, SFF, non-fiction, romance, etc. I've read a few I've liked such as The Crimson Petal and the White, Middlesex, Bastard Out of Carolina, and Water for Elephants, but I would love to hear about more like these.

Now as for suggestions, I don't have a particular genre I'm obsessed with. I was going to give some Classic Lit suggestions as I've probably read the most in that genre, but then again, everyone knows about Classic Lit. So, instead I thought I'd focus on non-fiction, personal essay-style, story suggestions (in no particular order):

Stiff by Mary Roach
Stiff is an informative and funny collection of personal essays where each reveals another possibility for what we can do with our bodies after death.

Naked by David Sedaris
Full of dark humor and strange occurrences, Sedaris recounts his less than normal life and discusses even the normal events in unusual ways.

Running with Scissors by Augusten Burroughs
Burroughs's coming of age collection of essays chronicles a young boy's inclusion in an extremely unusual family and his realization of his sexuality.

The Rice Room by Ben Fong Torres
Ben Fong-Torres may be most known as the inspiration for the lead in the film Almost Famous. The Rice Room reveals his origins in a strict Chinese family and his discovery of a new world, and its expectations and stereotypes of the Chinese.

Lame Deer: Seeker of Visions by John (Fire) Lame Deer
A true story of a mid-1900s medicine man, Lame Deer takes readers from a Bureau of Indian affairs boarding school designed to "civilize" through experiences with the American Indian movement to an acceptance and immersion in a shamanistic life.

Henry and June by Anais Nin
Drawn fron Nin's journal, Henry and June is the story of one woman's sexual journey with a married couple.

Patrimony by Philip Roth
In Patrimony, Roth explores his relationship with his father as his father slowly deteriorates from brain cancer.

Don't Let's Go to the Dogs Tonight by Alexandra Fuller
Fuller narrates events in her life as a child as her family tries to find its place in war-torn Africa and to survive and love each other.

The Latin Deli by Judith Ortiz Cofer
A collection of poems, short stories, and personal essays, The Latin Deli is an artistic look at the concerns and struggles of Spanish immigrants as they attempt to maintain cultural identity in a new world.

I would highly recommend any of these books. Far from dry recounting of facts, each is non-fiction but story-driven, and each offers readers the opportunity to not only learn about someone else's life but also about their own. The personal, social, cultural, and ideological issues are relevant and intriguing.

19 September 2009

Weekly Geeks: Burn Out


Weekly Geeks wants to know: Are you burnt out after a week like BBAW? How do you counter burn out? Take a break? Soldier on? Or if you don't feel burnt out after such weeks, why not? Also why are you a book blogger? From what I've seen and experienced, it's certainly not the fame or the glory that you get. So what is it? Why? Why? Why?

The answer in self-interview:

Good Trisha: Ah, it's been a long week. Time to get back to our normal routine.

Bad Trisha: *mutters" How come it's gotta stop?

Good Trisha: Come now dearie, you know you've been slacking on work. We have a ton of papers to grade, projects to assess, and lesson plans to create.

Bad Trisha: Don't wanna. I wanna blog and read and blog and read and blog and..

Good Trisha: That's enough now Trisha. Be a big girl and get to work.

Bad Trisha: No.

Good Trisha: *a bit exasperated* These papers won't grade themselves you know.

Bad Trisha: Don't care.

Good Trisha: *rolls her eyes* Of course you do sweetie. You want your students to learn, don't you?

Bad Trisha: *sulks prettily*

Good Trisha: Aren't you even the teensiest bit tired of books and blogging? Afterall it's been pretty hectic this last week.

Bad Trisha: NO! I'M NOT TIRED YET! I DON'T WANT IT TO END! I DON'T WANT TO WORK! AND YOU CAN'T MAKE ME!

Good Trisha: Well I think we should rest. Next week is Banned Books Week and then we have the 24 hour Read-a-Thon, and NCTE's National Day on Writing is coming up. You want to be rested and ready for all those fun things, don't you?

Bad Trisha: I guess....

Good Trisha: There now, be a good girl and let's get some work done, so we'll be ready for the rest of the book blogging fun.

*Good Trisha turns to pick up a stack of student papers. Bad Trisha bashes her over the head with Douglas Adams' Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, grabs a book and a computer and proceeds to do what she wants.*

Go Bad Trisha!

~~~~~~~~~~

I love reading and talking about books, so book blogging is a fun past time for me. I really do this for myself, so I never feel pressured to hurry up and post a review. Because of this lack of pressure, I don't really get burned out. I do what I want when I want and so far that's working out for me.

06 September 2009

Weekly Geeks: Reviews


For this week's Geek, participants were directed to a post by author Shannon Hale which discussed the process of reviewing books. Based on Hale's comments, we could tackle one of three options: 1) Revisiting a negative review; 2) writing a new review using Hale's questions for reviews; or 3) write a letter to Hale answering one of her questions for reviewers. I've decided to go for the last option.



Ms. Hale,

In your recent blog post, you asked if the process of writing a review changes the way I feel about the book in question. The answer is quite typically yes. Many times I have finished a book with a negative feeling towards it, and in the process of writing a review, found myself appreciating the book more and more. At first blush, this may be an indication of a indefinite personality, a flighty mindset, a wishy-washy wibble-wobbler if you will. But I refuse to accept that.

The process of analyzation can be quite revealing. The best illustration of my point may be with visual art, like a painting. Someone might glance at a Picasso and immediately say "I don't like it". But a closer look, an understanding of what it represents and how it was made, might lead the viewer to not only appreciate the painting more but perhaps even like it - despite the immediate response. Sometimes - not always - this is what happens to me while writing a review.

Maybe it's just that distance makes the heart grow fonder. A bad experience reading may be dulled the more time passes from the reading event itself. This was my experience with Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation. While reading, I was consistently with headache. The concepts, the terminology, were complex and getting through the book was a bit like trudging through an overgrown rosegarden - beauty greets you as the thorns prick and scrape and lodge in your skin. When I first finished that book, I heaved a sigh of relief and entertained serious thoughts of printing a picture of Baudrillard and burning it for fun. As months went by though, I found myself thinking of and verbally referring to ideas presented in the book. I finally wrote a review of the book, and the memory of my pain while reading faded to be replaced with almost fond remembrances of looking up three-penny words and cross-referencing complex concepts to construct the basic logic of the thesis.

Having an opinion on something with no idea how or why you hold that opinion is irresponsible and honestly quite irrelevant. If you can't prove a claim, you have no claim at all. Reviewing a book can most definitely affect how I feel about a book, and I think that is a sign of quality.

Then again, I might just be a wishy-washy wibbler-wobbler.

Yours Truly,

Trisha

29 August 2009

Weekly Geeks: An Obsession


Weekly Geeksters, tell us, do you have a collection, (or are you starting a collection,) of one particular book title? If so, what's your story? Why that book, and how many do you have, and what editions are they? Share pictures and give us all the details.


Or perhaps you dream about starting such a collection. What title would it be and what would it take for you to get motivated to start collecting?Or maybe it's the works of a particular author you collect (or want to collect) instead a certain book title?

I have to admit, I have never thought about this before. I certainly have and do own multiple copies of the same title, but it has always been a matter of practicality not collecting. Here are some books I have more than one of and why:

1. Go Ask Alice by Anonymous: I first read this book after finding it in a box of old books in the attic. Apparently it was my mother's copy. The binding was breaking apart, and a few years later, the book was in three sections. Still I read the falling-apart-at-the-seams book and it wasn't until years later that I bought the second copy. I still have the first, in three parts, because I like the history of it.

2. Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy series and Lord of the Rings series: I have multiples of these for the same reason: I got the entire series/collection in one hardcover book - I read it and loved it - I bought the individual paperbacks for easier re-reading. I also have the original HHG book I read, the first in the series, which was also in that old box of books where I found Go Ask Alice, and it too was falling apart.

3. Complete Works of William Shakespeare: I have the complete works in four different ways. First, I have two hardcover Complete Works. I also have the mass market paperbacks of the majority of his plays. Finally, my treasure: I attended St. Patrick's Academy for gradeschool, and when they decided to clean out the library in my eighth grade year, my little geek heart got all excited. The principal let me look through the library and pick out books I wanted. That is how I came into possession, in eighth grade, of the complete works of William Shakespeare, each with its own book, with a lovely if faded blue material cover, published in the early 1900s.

I supppose if I were to actually collect the different publishings of one title, it probably would be Adams's HHG. It's the book I've read the most often in my life, and it probably has some fun covers. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind owning the many different copies of Le Fanu's In a Glass Darkly - it would be pretty creepy to have an entire shelf dedicated to that book.

What about you guys? Obsessed with any one title?

22 August 2009

Weekly Geeks: It's About Time


This week's geek could not have been more appropriate. The assignment:
I think just about every reader has a least one book that they've been
meaning to read for awhile (months or even years) but, for one reason or another, they just haven't gotten around to it. Maybe it's a book a friend recommended last year, or a title you've flirted with in a bookstore on more than one occasion, or maybe it's a book that's sitting right there on your bookshelf, patiently waiting for you to pick it up -- but the thought is always there, in the back of your mind: Why haven't I read this yet?

This week, tell us about a book (or books) you have been meaning to read. What is it? How long have you wanted to read it? And, why haven't you read it yet?

For almost a year and a half I have been meaning to read Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose. I bought the book in Galena, Illinois, a small touristy town, in a rather dirty, unorganized book/old junk shop. I can't remember the name of the place, but I remember it being a cluttered, dusty mess with books thrown haphazardly around in piles, on shelves, in old jugs, on top of record players, and so on. The Name of the Rose was just sitting there next to a pile of old photographs, the black and white kind where no one smiled. Written on the inside cover was $7 and I snatched it up and bought it.

Then I promptly forgot about it for a year or so. When I reorganized my bookshelves, I saw it once again, remembered buying it, and thought 'I should really read this'. Then I proceeded to stare at it, put it back on the shelf and spend the next few months wanting to read it but worried about its 502 large pages and Eco's complex language and philosophy.

Once I started delving into the book blogging community, I found a way to motivate myself to read the book: challenges. I joined the Chunkster Challenge and realized The Name of the Rose was nover 450 pages and hence an appropriate book for the challenge, so it went on my list. That was months ago. It is the last book for that challenge I have to read. I've still been putting it off. Later, I joined the Take a Chance Challenge and for one of the books, I had to read something published in 1980 - guess what? The Name of the Rose fit, so on the list it went. And yep, I still didn't pick it up.

Finally, just last night - seriously, yesterday! - I grabbed it off my shelf without thinking about it and just started reading. I'm on page 101. The book is well-written and intriguing. It's a bit daunting as it is so full of historical references and information, but at the same time, I am very much enjoying the insights into this time period, not only the facts of what was going on but also the philosophical, moral, and social inclinations of the time. And it's a very Sherlock Holmes-y type of detective story, which is always fun.

Have any of you read this book yet? What did you think of it?

16 August 2009

Weekly Geeks: Give it One More Try


This Week's Geek is offering participants the opportunity to give a book or author a second chance. A little voice in my brain screamed "don't make me do this, don't make me do this" as I read the prompt:

There have been times in my life where I reread a book (or author) I hated--or thought I hated--but the second time around ended up loving. Has this ever happened to you? Have you ever changed your mind about a book or author the second time around? Have you ever given a book or author a second chance?

If you have, I'd love to hear your stories. Blog about your experience(s) in giving second chances.If you haven't, I'd like you to consider giving a book or an author a second chance. You can blog about your intentions to do so--or if you're a quick reader, maybe you can even squeeze something in!

Can't think of a single book or author? Don't worry, you can stretch this one to include movies or music if you prefer. It is just very interesting to me how time can change tastes and perceptions. How subjective the reading experience is and always will be.

I don't know that there has ever been a time where I gave a book a second chance. For the first 25 years of my life I finished every book I started whether I was enjoying it or not, but even that has ended. I'm not sure about authors. I can't actually think of a specific time I've read and disliked an author but then gone on to read a different book by the same author. I know a lot of people "read authors", going through an author's list of books, but that's just not how I read. I'm about the book, not the author, so it's not often I pick books by author.

This prompt did intrigue me, so I thought I might try a re-read. At first my mind jumped to the short list of books that I've always felt I should like because of my profession: The Red Badge of Courage, The Jungle, and Heart of Darkness. I read all three of these books while in high school and did not like any of them. As I got older and became more involved in "Literature" and "Education", it seemed to me that most of my colleagues enjoyed these books, but the memory of them kept me from every trying to re-read.

For this challenge, however, I'm thinking of something different. I did finish all three of my high school dislikes. I did not finish Ian McEwan's Atonement. I put it down not even half-way through because I was so frustrated with it. Yet, it seems that many people like McEwan, so out of the four books that popped into my head for this challenge, I'm going to try to re-read the one I never actually finished.

Wish me luck!

01 August 2009

Weekly Geeks: A Book Theme Song

Weekly Geeks prompt for August 1:

Music is a pretty amazing thing. It can take us back to the past, make us want to dance, put us in a romantic mood, or simply lift our spirits. But sometimes, music does something a little different for me: it reminds me of a book.

Yes, there is nothing more geeky than to be riding down the road listening to the radio and suddenly thinking "That song matches [book title] perfectly!". But that is exactly what happens to me sometimes. For example, whenever I hear Phil Collins' song 'Can't Stop Loving You,' I immediately think of Elizabeth Gaskell's novel North and South. To me, it is exactly the kind of song that describes the two main characters' relationship.

So, my fellow Weekly Geeks, your challenge this week is to come up with at least one song-book match. It could remind you of a theme from the book, a specific part of the plot, or even one of the characters (a sort of theme song, if you will). Be sure to include samples of the lyrics and the reason why that song reminds you of that book.

Love it! But danged if my brain isn't drawing a blank right now. I know this moment has happened - a song brings to mind a book - but I can't remember a single connection at this moment. Perhaps because the connection is too fleeting, perhaps because my brain doesn't work too well at 9am after late nights, who knows. So I have a plan: I'm going to start up the iPod while staring at my book shelves, listen to the first three songs and make connections...

Connection #1 Sweet Dreams by the Eurythmics and Interview with a Vampire by Anne Rice

"Everybody's looking for something
Some of them want to use you
Some of them want to get used by you
Some of them want to abuse you
Some of them want to be abused"

The desire, desperation, and depravity that comes through in these lyrics immediately brought to mind vampires, and more specifically it called to mind Louis and Lestat, the main characters in Anne Rice's Interview with a Vampire. I haven't read this book in years -we're talking 7 years at least, probably more like 12 or 14, and yet it was the first book I thought of when I heard this song. Louis and Lestat, each in their own specific and highly different way, want the same thing - to make sense of themselves and their place in the world and to have others understand as well. That same self-sadness is present in the song. And of course, the semi-insane sexiness that permeates the mythology of vampires is also part of the song. In each case, people are desiring something that is not necessarily good for them or wanting for the wrong reason.

Connection #2 Seether by Veruca Salt and Wicked by Gregory Maguire

I try to keep her on a short leash
I try to calm her down
I try to ram her into the ground
Can't fight the Seether
Can't fight the Seether
Can't fight the Seether
I can't see her til I'm foaming at the mouth

Seether is neither big nor small
Seether is the center of it all, I try to rock her in my cradle
I try to knock her out
I try to cram back in my mouth

Seether, to me, is primarily a woman talking about how difficult it can be to control her more bitchy side, her anger, the kind of anger a woman is not supposed to have. The Seether is the little me inside that wants to come out and kick some ass. Wicked falls directly along those lines with the lead character, Elphaba, who is a strong female. She is trying to stand up for what's right, but everyone just wants her to keep her mouth shut. Her anger is justified, but it does cause problems in part because she can't control it. She speaks out a time or two when it would have been more productive to hold her tongue and take a more manipulative or underhanded approach to the situation. But sometimes, you just can't fight the Seether.

Connection #3 So What by Pink and every Nora Roberts book that has a lead female character coming out of a bad relationship

So what
I'm still a rock star
I've got my rock moves
And I don't need you
And guess what
I'm having more fun
And now that we're done
I'm gonna show you
Tonight, I'm all right, I'm just fine
And you're a tool so,
So what I'm a rock star
I've got my rock moves
I don't want you tonight

You weren't there
You never were
You want it all
But that's not fair
I gave you life
I gave my all
You weren't there
You let me fall

Really this would work for almost every romance novel where the lead character has had a past relationship. These relationships are typically emotionally abusive (sometimes physically) where the male love interest was interested in the lead female character because she was a) a pure virgin who would be good for his image; b) a nice piece of eye candy; and/or c) easy to control. She, of course, does everything possible to make the relationship work, but the boyfriend/husband is a no-good ass. The female lead manages to leave this man and finds herself and the strength necessary to carry on an adult relationship with the (not-so) far from perfect lead male character. And she is "having more fun" and he really was "a tool" who was "never there".

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tons of fun. I kind of want to keep going and see what else I come up with. Someone should host this as a weekly meme!!!!

24 June 2009

Book Review: Lord of the Rings Trilogy


Title: Lord of the Rings
Author: J.R.R. Tolkien
Published: 2002 Pages: 1168
Genre: Fantasy, Adventure
Rating: 5/5

Buy  |  Borrow  |  Accept  |  Avoid

Plot Synopsis

The Lord of the Rings is a trilogy including Fellowship of the Ring, the Two Towers, and the Return of the King. I have read each book consequetively, one or two separately, and bits and pieces of a book every now and again.

FotR introduces readers to the cast of characters, especially the hobbits, situates readers in the time period, and begins the journey. TTT, of course, continues the adventure, and adds a twist to the plot by moving the main characters into two separate groups. RotK includes the height of the action, reunites our two groups, and wraps up the adventure.

I realize I've included very little detail, but I have two reasons for that. 1) I assume that most people are familiar with the storyline whether from the books or the films and 2) I hate reading plot synopses because they inevitably contain plot spoilers. What I really want to get to here are the questions posed for the Weekly Geeks assignment.

Becky asked quite a few questions so I'm going to handle them one or two at a time:

  • Did you enjoy this trilogy? I loved it, absolutely adored Lord of the Rings.
  • Who was your favorite character? Did you have a least favorite character? Both of those questions are very difficult to answer. I can't say that I have a favorite character. Gandalf and Saruman fascinate me the most, particularly their relationship to each other and to the world. As for least favorite character....probably Smeagol. He bothers me.
  • Did you skip the poetry by any chance? The first time I read the books and possibly the second, I did skip the poetry. It seemed an unnecessary time killer. As I started to become more and more interested in the world Tolkien had created, I started paying more attention to details like the poetry/music, and it started making more sense as I read other Tolkien books.
  • What is it about this one that you love most? I love the way Tolkien created an entire world with a past, present, and future. Each race has a language and a culture. The complexity is what drew me in and got be a bit obsessed.
  • Have you read any other Tolkien Middle-Earth novels? I have read the Silmarillion, portions of the HoME series, and a few critical theory type books by other authors regarding Middle Earth.
  • Have you seen the movies? Did you think they did justice to the books? I would say 80% of the time I find the movie seriously lacking, but in this instance, I was very pleased with the movies. I found them exciting, moving, beautiful, and well-done. And while there were definite differences, I fell that in the end the movies got at the Truth of the books.
Another Cookie Crumbles says he wants to read this trilogy. All I can say is ABSOLUTELY GO FOR IT.

My Final Thoughts on LotR

The trilogy is worth the time and effort it takes to read. From time to time, I found myself wondering why I had to read about every vein on every leaf on every tree in the forest (slight exaggeration), in the end all of that detail helped create the world I fell so much in love with. If you haven't read Lord of the Rings yet, go now to your nearest bookstore.

20 June 2009

Weekly Geeks: Reading Challenges



This week's Weekly Geeks topic was suggested by Sheri of A Novel Menagerie. She writes:


"Reading Challenges: a help or a hurt? Do you find that the reading challenges keep you organized and goal-oriented? Or, do you find that as you near the end of a challenge that you've failed because you fell short of your original goals? As a result of some reading challenges, I've picked up books that I would have otherwise never heard of or picked up; that, frankly, I have loved. Have you experienced the same with challenges? If so, which ones? Do you have favorite reading challenges?"

As we pass the halfway point of 2009, how are you doing with your reading challenges? Did you participate in any challenges this year?

I have been thinking about this quite a bit lately; although not necessarily for the reasons listed. First, I love the reading challenges. I love completing them, and that is where my problem comes in. I sign-up for the challenge, look at my list for that challenge, and start reading. The problem is stopping. I'm having difficulty picking up books that aren't part of a challenge; I'm reading way too fast because I want to finish.

For example, in the past two and a half months, I have joined five challenges. The most difficult, The Chunkster Challenge, calls for books over 450 pages in length and no YAL. I have already read three books for this challenge. The What's in a Name Challenge - 4 books done. Dream King Challenge - 4 books and 2 movies. Technically, I'm done with The Chunkster Challenge, and I only have two books left for What's in a Name. And I have until the end of the YEAR to finish these challenges. It's ridiculous!

My other problem is that this is not the way I'm used to choosing books. Typically, what I read is the result of randomness, not planning. I pick a book off my shelves on a whim. It may be one I've never read or one I've read 20 times. But now, with reading challenges, I feel like I have to be more structured, like I have to read a book off my challenges lists.

All of this is very odd as I'm generally not a goal-oriented person. I don't make timelines for projects at work or lists of what to do on my day off. I'm perfectly happy starting something and not finishing it because something else came up. I wouldn't exactly call myself "flighty" but well, yeah, I can be flighty....easily distracted....ummm, refreshingly spontaneous and laid back!

For some reason, though, these reading challenges cause a great desire to finish within me. I really like adding the "strike" tags. If I don't slow down though, I'm going to burn out. So I'm going to take a deep breath, relax, and remember that the world won't end if I don't finish each of my challenges in record time.

Book Review: Stiff

Title: Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers
Author: Mary Roach
Published: 2003 Pages: 294
Genre: Nonfiction, Death and Dying
Rating: 5/5


Buy  |  Borrow  |  Accept  |  Avoid


Weekly Geeks asked participants to list books they have read but not reviewed and then invite others to ask questions about these books. The idea was to help us catch up on our reviews. I listed Stiff as an option.

Plot Synopsis

Mary Roach explores life after death in Stiff. What are the possibilities for a human cadaver? Wide-reaching according to this books which looks at test-cadavers, body snatching, crucifixion, human decay, and medicinal cannibalism.

Eva wants to know my favorite part of Stiff.

Choosing a favorite part of this book is like deciding which sprinkle you like best on your ice cream sundae. This is one of my favorite books, for a few reasons: it's hilarious, well-written and researched, and fascinating. Two parts stand out to me a bit more than the others: I think it is very cool that in Sweden my body can be thrown on a compost pile and used as fertilizer. The chapter discussing the history of the definition and identification of "dead" had me laughing and shaking my head in despair. Really though, the entire book is full of interesting facts.

softdrink of fizzy thoughts couldn’t read the chapter on plane crashes, and Vasilly said the part on how bullets get tested and the "corpse" farm almost made me lose my lunch a few times. Both wanted to know if there were any parts in the book which were difficult for me to read.

I have yet to encounter something I can't read...at least for the reason suggested in your questions. I mean, I've put down a boring book and a headache causing book, but I've never had to put down a book because of "graphic content" be it bloody body parts, deviant sex, or any other cause for an R rating.

In some instances, I couldn't tell you why. For example, A Child Called "It", while it definitely disturbed me - I was sick to my stomach - I kept on reading. This doesn't make sense. Stiff, on the other hand, I can tell you why it doesn't bother me. She is writing about dead bodies, not real people. Whatever happens to a body after death, you are gone, whatever it is that makes you you, the soul, the mind, whatever, it is done for, kipput, out the door. I don't hold with the beliefs that your body has to remain intact after death. I believe cemetaries are, basically, a waste of space, and I believe the world is better served if my body is put to some good use after death - harvest my organs, practice surgery on me, then throw me on the compost heap. In other words, Stiff, to me, is a practical book, not a scary or disturbing one.

I'm not sure what that says about me....

Vasilly also asks: What did you think of Stiff? Was this your first book by Mary Roach?

Well, I certainly think I've answered the first question: I loved this book. It was my first one by Mary Roach, and I can not remember where I first heard about it. New York Times best seller list? Chicago Tribune 'what people are reading around town' section? Television? It seriously might have been television; I'm pretty sure I remember the book being mentioned on some random sitcom; although I think that was after I purchased the book and before I read it.

Once I read Stiff, I was hooked. Now, I have read Roach's other nonfiction works as well. Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife and Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Sex and Science are, just like Stiff, very interesting, very humorous looks at concepts that fascinate. In Spook, Roach researches the use of science in detecting, evaluating, and debunking the supernatural. Bonk, obvious from the subtitle, is a collection of essays (all of these books read like an essay collection) on the scientific - and not so scientific - study of sex.

My Final Thoughts on Stiff

I loved this book and I would highly recommend it to others. I enjoyed the topic, the personality of Roach revealed in this first person narrative, and the way the essays were written. I actually don't have much to say that is negative. Perhaps time has made the heart grow fonder about this book - it has been quite a while since I read it - but I don't think that is the case. I remember fully enjoying Stiff and wishing, when I reached the last page, that it wasn't over. It is possible, however, that any annoying bits have washed away from my memory. But if they were there to begin with, they must have been small.

19 June 2009

Book Review: Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy



Title: The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Author: Douglas Adams
Published: 6 stories between 1979 and 1992
Pages: 815
Genre: Science Fiction
Rating: 5/5

Buy  |  Borrow  |  Accept  |  Avoid

Plot Synopsis

Well, there are six stories in this volume, so let's give a quick run-down of each. First, we have the book that hooked me, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy which chronicles the adventures of Ford and Dent as they roam through the universe after the destruction of Earth - a hyperspatial express route was needed and Earth was in the way.

The Restaurant at the End of the Universe, book 2, pairs Ford and Dent with Zaphod and Trillian. The four spend their time seeking the ultimate question to the ultimate answer, and watching the end of the universe.

Life, the Universe, and Everything plays upon the previous two novels and has Dent and company are tasked with saving the universe.

So Long and Thanks for all the Fish brings us back to Earth, not currently demolished for the bypass. Arthur must figure out why - and where all the dolpins went.

Young Zaphod Plays it Safe, book 5, has Zaphod exploring the reasons a ship that could never crash crashed and learning a few disturbing secrets about himself and the universe along the way.

The last book, Mostly Harmless, has Arthur trying to get back to Earth, but becoming a master sandwich maker instead. While he's making his sandwiches some not good things are happening to the Guide.

Weekly Geeks asked participants to list books they have read but not reviewed and then invite others to ask questions about these books. The idea was to help us catch up on our reviews. I listed Hitchhiker's Guide as one of those books. I'm pretty sure most people thought I meant only the original, and honestly that's probably what I was thinking when I listed the book, but I thought if I was going to review, I may as well throw in the Ultimate Guide.



Louise wanted a quick summary of HHG.

*points above*

Bart from Bart’s Bookshelf had some excellent questions for an HHG reader including “do you know where your towel is” and “who is your favorite character”.

Well Bart, I have a plethora of towels in various locations just in case. I have a towel in the trunk of my car, attached to my golf bag, in a drawer at work, and of course there is a square-shaped material of some sort in every room of my house.

My favorite character.....tough one.....I adore Marvin with his pessimistic, fatalistic depression. He definitely ranks up there on a list of favorite characters. And I would think that second place would probably go to Ford. His personality is addicting.

Becky asks: Did you enjoy this one? Who would you recommend this one to? Do you think it would be a good place for sci-fi newbies to start? Have you read any of the sequels? Have you seen the movie? If you have, would you recommend them?

I think this is an excellent place for SF newbies to start because the book never takes itself too seriously like some SF books do. The humor is laugh-out-loud funny and rather insightful. I have read all of the sequels and have seen the movie. The sequels I highly recommend; the film is so-so. Like many book-film transitions, the movie is just too different and doesn't capture the complex, humor-filled, satirical essence of HHG.

Jodie of Book Gazing asks: What was your favourite crazy sci-fi detail from Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy? How do you feel about the proposed ‘new’ Hitchhiker book being written by Eoin Coiffer?

This is a tough question. My favorite crazy sci-fi detail from HHG? I'm not even sure I could pick one without re-reading the novels. A few things jump out at me: the origins of the human species being the unnecessaries from another culture, the Earth game cricket's connection to the Krikkit Wars, and the gin and tonic phenomena are the ones which really stand out.

I'm fine with someone writing a new HHG book. I'm not a fan of re-telling whether it's a book, movie, or song, but I'm a-okay with new authors/directors/singers adding to the collection. For example, Coiffer adding a book to the HHG series is perfectly acceptable; him trying to rewrite the original HHG, not so much. Madonna remaking American Pie, ugh; Kid Rock using portions of Sweet Home Alabama to create a new song, okey-dokey. Texas Chainsaw Massacre 45...good stuff; updated version of Psycho, bad. Make sense?

My Final Thoughts on HHG

When people ask me if I have a favorite book, this is the only one which always makes the list. And yes, I give a list when someone asks for a favorite book. HHG, the original single story, appealed to me so much when I first read it (sometime in high school), I re-read the book immediately after finishing it - two readings in less than three weeks.

I love the way it is written. For example, I just randomly let the book fall open and this is the passage that first caught my eye:

Bypasses are devices that allow some people to dash from point A to point B very fast while other people dash from point B to point A very fast. People living at point C, being a poitn directly in between, are often given to wonder what's so great about point A that so many people from point B are so keen to get there, and what's so gread about point B that so many people from point A are so keen to get there. They often wish that people would just once and for all work out where they hell they wanted to be.

Hilarious.

Book Review: Wicked

Title: Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West
Author: Gregory Maguire
Published: 1995 Pages: 406
Genre: Fantasy
Rating: 5/5

Buy  |  Borrow  |  Accept  |  Avoid

Weekly Geeks asked participants to list books they have read but not reviewed and then invite others to ask questions about these books. The idea was to help us catch up on our reviews. I listed Wicked as one of those books and four people had questions for me.

Plot Synopsis

Many suggest that Wicked retells the Wizard of Oz story from the Wicked Witches point of view. But it's not that simple. This is not a retelling; this is a complete reworking. Dorothy doesn't even come in to play until the last of the five sections of the book. Wicked is the biography of Elphaba, an intelligent, green-skinned outcast who longs for acceptance and love. It is also the story of Oz, a land troubled by inequalities and power hungry politicians.


Maree, Becky, and Yati all asked how I felt about the book in general.

I loved this book. I found the story fascinating, and I truly enjoyed the new spin on familiar characters and settings. With a complex and heartrending plotline, Maguire really draws the reader in to the world of Oz, which in this book becomes a world unto itself instead of the mirror image of Kansas Oz was in the original story.

Becky also wanted to know who I would recommend it to, and if I have read any of the sequels.

I haven't read the sequels, but I have read Mirror, Mirror and Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister. While I enjoyed both of those books, they did not appeal to me in the same way Wicked did. I thought Wicked was much more complex and much more mature than the others. I do own Lost, but it's been sitting on my TBR shelf for quite some time.

Becky and softdrink of fizzy thoughts wondered if I thought Maguire has gone too far with the whole rewriting of Oz and other tales.

I can see how some people would be troubled by the revising of such an iconic work. When a person plays around with a story which has permeated a culture, he/she takes a real risk. For me, however, a rewriting of a classic tale can be very powerful, especially when the rewriting is a transitioning process between a children's story and adult literature. Fleshing out a fairy tale and bringing it into the realm of adult lit offers us the possibility of further exploring those worlds we first encountered in our youth - but seeing them as an adult. I love this.

softdrink of fizzy thoughts also was curious as to which genre I would classify the book.

I immediately classified Wicked as a Fantasy novel. Maguire creates a world where magic exists, where animals speak, and little green girls can make monkeys fly. I think it's possible the book could be classified as a political book and possibly even a romance novel, but fantasy suits the book best in my opinion.

My Final Thoughts on Wicked

I have read the book once and have seen the musical twice. I won't even get in to the differences between the two here. Suffice it to say that the musical is made more mainstream to draw a larger audience. Despite that fact, I loved the musical as well as the book, and if you haven't seen the musical, you really should.

Doing this has made me want to read the book again!