An Old Favorite is a meme here on eclectic / eccentric in which I feature some of my favorite reads from pre-blogging or early blogging days. I want to do this, not just to highlight some awesome books but also to explore how my memory stands up to the original review. One of my complaints regarding my reading is the serious lack of retention. Sometimes I read books, and within days, I have forgotten entire pieces of the literary puzzle. If you are interested in participating, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments section. You can do this on any day, at any time.
Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka was a book I did not expect to like. I read it for the first time in November of 2007 after finding out a colleague of mine was something of a Kafka addict:
The problem of interpreting Kafka's Metamorphosis is two-fold: one, it lends itself to a variety of interpretations; two, it's been interpretated and discussed so many times that even those who haven't read it have thoughts on its meaning. What I've always found striking about the book is the transformation of the family after Gregor's metamorphosis into a bug.
Prior to the metamorphosis, and hence prior to the opening of the book, Gregor's father, mother, and sister were rather useless. All three relied on Gregor to support them, and while readers are given the impression that this is due to some rational explanation such as physical problems, age consideration, etc., the conclusion of the book clearly indicates that all three are capable of work.
The father failed in a previous business adventure, leaving the family in debt and Gregor responsible for paying it off. Gregor worked hard to do so and eventually Gregor "earned enough to meet the expenses of the entire family and did so" but the family "had simply grown used to it." They expected it and seemed perfectly comfortable to let Gregor continue in a job he disliked, which forced him from his home for long periods of time, with no feelings of guilt. This easy allowance of one person to take on the burdens of an entire family is so antithetical to my philosophy that I am absolutely disgusted by the family almost immediately when reading the book.
When Gregor is turned into a bug and no longer capable of working, each member of the family gets a job which is "entirely satisfactory and seem[s] to be particularly promising." Despite the many, many interpretations possible, I choose (today) to read the book as a reminder that if everyone pulls his own weight and takes control of his own life, the world will be a happier place. It's also, in my opinion, a slight admonishment of those who allow themselves to take on responsibility for others. After all, Gregor had to be forcibly removed from the family in order for his father, sister, and mother to become independent entities - and he dies, in part, because when they are finally able to take care of themselves, there is no longer a reason for him to exist.
I perfectly realize and can even appreciate the other interpretations: the Freudian look at Kafka's relationship with his own father, the social criticism of the way those who are different are treated, a look at the effects of isolation and loneliness, a metaphorical look at the writing process, a criticism of the bourgeois life, etc. and perhaps tomorrow I will have a different outlook on the book. And that, when it comes down to it, is the insight of literary interpretation: How a book is interpreted reveals more about the reader than the author.
Buy | Borrow | Accept | Avoid
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is one I remember; whether because of the length or the visual nature of the story I am not sure. It could be my irrational fear of bugs that made the story memorable. Or it could be the absolute distaste I felt for Gregor's family as even years later, I still get a sickly feeling thinking about them - my individualist, hard-working Midwest attitude coming out I guess.
For those of you who have not yet read this one, I highly recommend it, and that should be easy, as you can read it for free online or download it to your e-reader!
This is included in my 100 follower giveaway...a book I received as part of a bundle for completing surveys I never really fancied reading it myself!
ReplyDeleteMy Chaucer professor at Yale last summer always warned us to remember while we read Canterbury Tales, the tales are also reading us. I think that's what's happened here, but that's okay. It's part of what makes rereading such a rich experience.
ReplyDeleteI read this one more than once for college classes. I always really enjoyed it, although I wouldn't have expected to!
ReplyDeleteI have always wanted to read this one, and I thank you for your indepth review and also the news that I can get this one for free. Off to download now!
ReplyDeleteNever read any Kafka, but have always been told this is a good one to start with. Great insights.
ReplyDeleteIrrational fear of bugs, huh? all of them? ;)
ReplyDeleteI have always been way too intimdated by Kafka to read this or anything else by him. When we were in Prague a few years ago we did see a very interesting Kafkaesque statue of two men peeing (in motion). Think it was out front of his museum? But...knowing I can download for free...think I'll do that!
I had to read Metamorphosis for one of my undergrad English classes, and I remember really liking it. A lot of those 'required reading' books left a bad taste in my mouth, but this was one of a few I really enjoyed reading and analyzing.
ReplyDeleteSo so true: "How a book is interpreted reveals more about the reader than the author." It's been a long time since I've read Metamorphosis, but I may soon again thanks to your post!
ReplyDeleteI loved this book when I read it in high school, though it's one of those I think I would interpret very differently now than I did then. (WHAT was with the rotting apple?! That was my big question.)
ReplyDeleteIn reading your review, I DEFINITELY didn't get the whole "providing for yourself makes you happier" gist, so now I want to reread...
Yeah, I totally enjoyed reading your review even though that book FREAKS me OUT. I hate bugs, so I just get grossed out reading it. Hahaha. My prof (and one of my classmates) was all, "But it's so funny and ridiculous!" And I was just like GROSS.
ReplyDeleteSo I have never thought about the story beyond that, really. Which is why I like your analysis so much.
This is a book I definitely want to reread. I remember being really impressed the first time I read it. Consequently, it has stayed with me, but I need to see what my views on it would be 15 years later.
ReplyDelete