31 August 2011

An Old Favorite: The Thirteenth Tale

An Old Favorite is a (now and again) meme here on eclectic / eccentric in which I feature some of my favorite reads from pre-blogging or early blogging days. I want to do this, not just to highlight some awesome books but also to explore how my memory stands up to the original review. One of my complaints regarding my reading is the serious lack of retention. Sometimes I read books, and within days, I have forgotten entire pieces of the literary puzzle. If you are interested in participating, feel free to leave a link to your post in the comments section. 

Back in January of 2007, I read Diane Setterfield's The Thirteenth Tale. Here is what I had to say:

I spent 30 dollars on this book in an airport, through-security-locked-in-high-price bookstore. The book was not worth 30 bucks, but it was a very interesting read focusing on the myth of truth. I was pleased by the strangely gothic tale, and yet the focus on twins put me off a bit. I found the extreme distress the main character felt about her twin dying after birth and her parents' hiding of this fact a bit unbelievable. Then again, I am not a twin.

The similarities to Jane Eyre, mentioned often in the book, Wuthering Heights, and Rebecca is comforting, and I don't think I have ever read a contemporary novel with this particular feel. Ghosts that are and are not ghosts, old dilapidated mansions, hidden cottages, twisted families, and secrets secrets secrets.

"Perhaps it's better not to have a story at all, rather than have one that keeps changing" and maybe "a weightless story is better than one that is too heavy." This problem - no story, painful story, easy story - is at the heart of this tale. The characters in the novel all must reconcile themselves to the story of their lives, no matter how painful or how lacking.

"My gripe is not with lovers of the truth but with truth herself. What succor, what consolation is there in truth, compared to a story? What good is truth, at midnight, in the dark, when the wind is roaring like a bear in the chimney? When the lightning strikes shadows on the bedroom wall and the rain taps at the window with its long fingernails? No. When fear and cold make a statue of you in your bed, don't expect hard-boned and fleshless truth to come running to your aid. What you need are the plump comforts of a story. The soothing, rocking safety of a lie." I find the views on truth fascinating in this story. The same woman in the story who writes this also explains that the truth has been eating at her all of her life and that she must tell the truth to someone, have it recorded, before she dies.

And yet, just a few pages later in the story, another character gets to the heart of this dilemma. "People disappear when they die. Their voice, their laughter, the warmth of their breath. Their flesh. Eventually their bones. All living memory of them ceases. This is both dreadful and natural....{but} like flies in amber, like corpses frozen in ice, that which according to the laws of nature should pass away is, by the miracle of ink on paper, preserved. It is a kind of magic." So by writing the truth down, having her life story and the life story of those close to her, recorded, her life is preserved.

"Don't you think you can tell the truth much better with a story?" This really struck me because I believe the answer is yes. Sometimes a lie, a made up story, actually reveals more of the truth than a recounting of what actually happened. The truth of the emotions one is feeling at a particular point in time, or the truth of the lesson one has learned, may require more than the facts to translate to others.

By the end, I still don't understand the almost debilitating sense of loss the protagonist feels regarding her twin, but despite my inability to connect with that portion of the story, there is so much I can connect with that I really enjoyed the book.

Buy  |  Borrow  |  Accept  |  Avoid

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My memory of this book is almost completely gone. Even reading my notes doesn't make the story resonate with me. My ability to completely forget even those books which I clearly really enjoyed is a wee bit disturbing. I think part of the problem is that I read very fast and quite often. But even that doesn't completely account for my memory issues. It's like I completely involve myself in the world the author has created, and then once I close the book, I come back to reality with a sort of amnesia, the details slipping away immediately like a car depreciating in value once you've driven it off the lot.

I guess I'll add this one to the Need To Re-Read List. :)

9 comments:

  1. I have a very bad case of CRS (can't remember shit) and it has been this way forever. When I talk to my high school friends, I wonder if I was in the same school as they were. Same with books. I do know I did LOVE this one on audio...very gothic, very creepy. I love the twin thing. Twins are creepy in the very best way possible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Me too with the CRS - maybe we need a grant from the National Institutes of Health?

    I also believe that sometimes a story tells the truth better than the truth...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also have a problem retaining what I read, and unless a book hits some very high points with me, I forget a lot of it almost instantly. I really hate that, and that is one of the reasons I started the blog. I wanted a place where I could remember and contemplate the books I read before I forgot them. I read this book for a book club a couple of years ago, and thought that it was very good. You are right when you say that parts were unbelievable, but on the whole, I really enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am glad to know I am not the only one with retention issues. This book is a great example. I read it about five years ago and I literally remember nothing about it!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just how old is this favorite that you can't recall it? HAHA! I have the exact same problem.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I remember hearing good things about this book... it's funny, though, I forget things too. My one friend remembers all these plot details about books and movies and TV shows, which I guess is why she isn't a re-reader. Me? Even with my favourites I forget enough about the little details to enjoy re-reading. But yah, those ones where you liked it enough but not incredibly? Totally forgotten. I could re-read them and go "oh yah, I did read this" but I probably still couldn't pick out the twist of the plot.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Same thing happens to me. I'll go back and read what I've written and it still doesn't cause instant recall.
    I do remember liking this one too.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ha! I've been considering rereading this one myself as well. I picked up a used copy from the thrift store and am curious to see how I feel after reading it again. Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Trisha, I have this same memory problem with books. But I have a particularly great memory for everything else. I remember everyone's birthdays, even people I knew eons ago but no longer have contact with. I could repeat a conversation almost verbatim at times. I remember things in minute detail down to what I was wearing on what occasion. So how come I can't remember the books I read?? I like how you describe it as getting lost completely in the world and then having amnesia after you close the book.

    I read this one a few years back and really liked it. I re-read it last autumn and enjoyed just as much I remembered the first time around. I have a fascination with twins so the acute sense of loss didn't seem that weird to me as I have read a lot about twins. However, that her parents would keep it a secret was very bizarre.

    -jehara

    ReplyDelete

Talk to me baby!