Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales is one of the most studied books of all time in my experience. I seriously have looked at bits and pieces of this text over and over again throughout my education and my career. This time I read it in very time bites and analyzed it piecemeal.
First up, the description of the Wife of Bath in the General Prologue. I really enjoyed this description. A deaf,
gap-toothed, red-stocking-wearing woman, the Wife of Bath sews like a pro, rides
well, talks easily, and travels widely. Most importantly, she is well known for
her love of men. She has been married five times, and that’s not including the
men she’d gone with when she was younger. These experiences made her quite
knowledgeable about “remedies of love” (477).
The whole description of the Wife suggests sex. The red
stockings and red face, the many men she married or kept company with, even her
gap-toothed grin. Apparently, this physicality was “thought to be a sign of
amorousness” (Greenblatt 254). Hilariously
– and horrifyingly – “a gap-toothed devout virgin had to fill the space
cosmetically, or refrain from smiling” (Cosman 476). That. Is. Hilarious.
Even the juxtaposition of certain phrases were designed to
indicate a sensual nature and a wealth of experience. Take the following two
lines for example: “She coude muchel of wandring by the waye: / Gat-toothed was
she, soothly for to saye” (469-470). On initial reading, the first line seems
to simple say that the Wife was a skilled traveler; but coupling it with the
following line which is suggestive of sensuality, the line could be
reinterpreted. Perhaps the Wife was skilled at wandering from man to man or was
adventurous romantically or sexually. This
subtle suggestion is reinforced when the speaker says “she coude of that art
the olde daunce” (478), again indicating the Wife is highly experienced in the ways of the flesh.
Phrases like this today would have a “hint, hint” or a “wink, wink” to go along
with them. Or maybe a more amusing ‘that’s what she said’.
This focus on sexuality carries over into the very naming of
the Wife. While the other pilgrims are named by profession – Miller, Franklin,
Cook, etc. – the Wife is not called Seamstress. Barbara Daniels argues that
this change in the naming system “makes her more personalized”, but I argue
that this also highlights the importance of sexuality to the character. Even
though her trade is in sewing, her true profession is Wife.
I remember the first time I read this back in high school. I
was surprised by how bawdy it all was, and I wasn’t even catching half of the
suggestions or double entendres. Was/Is anyone else surprised by this? Do you
see any other indications of sexuality in this passage? What do you think
Chaucer meant, specifically, by the phrase “remedies of love” (477)?
Side Note: Do you know how many sexy women of today have a freaking gap between their teeth?!?!? Check it out.
________________________________________________________________
Chaucer, Geoffrey. “The Canterbury Tales: The General
Prologue”. Trans. Simon Armitage. The Norton Anthology of English Literature.
Gen. ed. Stephen Greenblatt. 9th ed. Vol. A. New York: Norton, 2012.
243-263. Print.
Cosman, Madeleine Pelner, and Linda Gale Jones. Handbook to Life in the Middle Ages. Infobase
Publishing, 2009. Google Books. Web.
17 June 2015.
Daniels, Barbara. “The Wife of Bath: Her Description from
the General Prologue to the Canterbury
Tales.” Classics of English
Literature. Web. 17 June 2015.
Greenblatt,
Stephen, gen. ed. The Norton
Anthology of English Literature. 9th ed. Vol. A. New York: Norton, 2012.
Print.
Appreciate your bblog post
ReplyDelete